Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content
This is a Non-Federal dataset covered by different Terms of Use than Data.gov.

East Fork White River Chute Cutoff with UAS (ESPL), Indiana, 2018

Metadata Updated: November 12, 2020

Meandering river sinuosity increases until the channel erodes into itself (neck cutoff) or forms a new channel over the floodplain (chute cutoff) and sinuosity is reduced. Unlike neck cutoff, which can be measured or modeled without considering overbank processes, chute cutoff must be at least partially controlled by channel-forming processes on the floodplain. Even though chute cutoff controls meandering river form, the processes that cause chute cutoff are not well understood. This study analyzes the morphology of two incipient chute cutoffs along the East Fork White River, Indiana, USA, using high temporal and spatial resolution UAS-based lidar and aerial photography. Lidar and aerial imagery obtained between 1998 and 2019 reveals that large scour holes formed in the center of both chutes sometime after chute channel initiation. A larger analysis within the study watershed reveals that scour holes within incipient chutes can be stable or unstable and tend to stabilize when the chute is colonized by native vegetation and forest. When the scour holes form in farmed floodplain, they enlarge rapidly after initial formation and contribute to complete chute cutoff. In addition, this study shows that the formation of scour holes can occur in response to common, relatively low-magnitude floods and that the amount of incipient chute erosion does not depend on peak flood magnitude. The role of scour holes in enlarging of chute channels could be an important mechanism for chute channel evolution in meandering rivers. This study also confirms that understanding the relationships among flow, land cover, and cutoff morphology is substantially improved with on-demand remote sensing techniques like integrated UAS and lidar.

Access & Use Information

Non-Federal: This dataset is covered by different Terms of Use than Data.gov. License: No license information was provided.

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Date January 14, 2020
Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date November 12, 2020
Reference Date(s) January 14, 2020 (publication)
Frequency Of Update

Metadata Source

Harvested from OpenTopography CSW

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Date January 14, 2020
Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date November 12, 2020
Reference Date(s) January 14, 2020 (publication)
Responsible Party University of Waterloo (Originator); OpenTopography (Originator)
Contact Email
Guid OTDS.012020.26916.1
Access Constraints
Bbox East Long -86.204918467737
Bbox North Lat 38.782247485827
Bbox South Lat 38.7706699143854
Bbox West Long -86.2235371293474
Coupled Resource
Frequency Of Update
Harvest Object Id 725e5514-6536-4d5a-bd3a-488f6126fa6e
Harvest Source Id 1017486a-47c7-4139-9ed4-a4d93503679a
Harvest Source Title OpenTopography CSW
Licence
Metadata Language en
Metadata Type geospatial
Progress
Spatial Data Service Type
Spatial Reference System NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_16N [EPSG: 26916]
Spatial Harvester True

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.