Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to content

Optimizing sampling across methods improves the power of ecological monitoring data

Metadata Updated: May 8, 2025

Transect-based monitoring has long been a valuable tool in ecosystem monitoring. These transects are often used to measure multiple ecosystem attributes. The line-point intercept (LPI), vegetation height, and canopy gap intercept methods comprise a set of core methods, which provide indicators of ecosystem condition. However, users struggle to design a sampling strategy that optimizes the ability to detect ecological change using transect-based methods. We assessed the sensitivity of these core methods on a one-hectare plot to transect length, number, and sampling interval to determine: 1) minimum sampling required to describe ecosystem characteristics and detect change for each method and 2) optimal transect length and number for all three methods to make recommendations for future analyses and monitoring efforts. We used data from 13 National Wind Erosion Research Network locations spanning the western US, which included 151 measurements over time across five biomes. We found that longer and increased numbers of transects were more important for reducing sampling error than increased sample intensity along transects. For all methods and indicators across plots, three 100-m transects reduced sampling error so that indicator estimates fall within an 95% confidence interval of +/- 5% for canopy gap intercept and LPI-total foliar cover, +/- 5 cm for height and +/- two species for LPI-species counts. For the same criteria at 80% confidence intervals, two 100-m transects are needed. Site-scale inference was strongly affected by sample design, consequently our understanding of ecological dynamics may be influenced by sampling decisions.

Access & Use Information

Public: This dataset is intended for public access and use. License: Creative Commons Attribution

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Created Date December 5, 2024
Metadata Updated Date May 8, 2025
Data Update Frequency irregular

Metadata Source

Harvested from USDA JSON

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Created Date December 5, 2024
Metadata Updated Date May 8, 2025
Publisher Agricultural Research Service
Maintainer
Identifier 10.6073/pasta/b8b8abc0471c826c755788c3f24a2c1b
Data Last Modified 2025-04-01
Public Access Level public
Data Update Frequency irregular
Bureau Code 005:18
Metadata Context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
Schema Version https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
Catalog Describedby https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
Harvest Object Id 70315fd5-a662-4586-8724-0a3101b141cd
Harvest Source Id d3fafa34-0cb9-48f1-ab1d-5b5fdc783806
Harvest Source Title USDA JSON
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Old Spatial {"type": "MultiPoint", "coordinates": -117.004, 41.7507, -105.691, 37.599, -117.216, 41.6204, -118.285, 46.8872, -100.925, 46.7606, -109.87, 38.6515, -100.95, 46.7747, -108.913, 32.2647, -106.739, 32.6271, -106.107, 32.9422, -98.0391, 35.555, -104.697, 40.8349, -103.142, 40.1609}
Program Code 005:040
Source Datajson Identifier True
Source Hash 157d978b8fb7f97947fc625ceb72d4075ee1d5bd592299db9d84a81d63391582
Source Schema Version 1.1
Spatial {"type": "MultiPoint", "coordinates": -117.004, 41.7507, -105.691, 37.599, -117.216, 41.6204, -118.285, 46.8872, -100.925, 46.7606, -109.87, 38.6515, -100.95, 46.7747, -108.913, 32.2647, -106.739, 32.6271, -106.107, 32.9422, -98.0391, 35.555, -104.697, 40.8349, -103.142, 40.1609}
Temporal 2015-07-01/2023-07-31

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.