Content deleted Content added
→categories, popularity and commons logging: Added a remark |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Java}}. Tag: |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Java|importance=low}}
}}
==NPOV==
The summary paragraphs on log4j and Java Logging make it appear that log4j should be used just because it is more popular, but log4j is more popular because it has been in existence longer. Rewriting these two paragraphs would improve the neutrality.
[[User:LanceHelsten|LanceHelsten]] ([[User talk:LanceHelsten|talk]]) 18:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Line 11 ⟶ 13:
* printing to standard output channels directly. Useful when logging hasn't even been bootstrapped yet. [[User:SteveLoughran|SteveLoughran]] ([[User talk:SteveLoughran|talk]]) 13:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
:::From the comparison between the talk page and current section text, I believe an editor forgot to remove the NPOV tag, so I did. -- [[User:Alainr345|<span style="display:inline-block; position:relative; top:20px;
== measuring popularity ==
Line 29 ⟶ 31:
Spring Framework reference 3.0 Chapter 1.3.2.1 Not using commons logging
"Unfortunately, the runtime discovery algorithm in commons-logging, while convenient for the end-user, is problematic. If we could turn back the clock and start Spring now as a new project it would use a different logging dependency." [[http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/spring-framework-reference/html/overview.html]]
--[[Special:Contributions/178.24.246.195|178.24.246.195]] ([[User talk:178.24.246.195|talk]]) 22:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
| |||