Content deleted Content added
Added a reference to back an existing claim. |
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 11:
| title = The Status of the P Versus NP Problem
| volume = 52
| year = 2009
| s2cid = 5969255
}}.</ref>
The program is pursued by several researchers in mathematics and theoretical computer science. Part of the reason for the interest in the program is the existence of arguments for the program avoiding known barriers such as [[Oracle machine|relativization]] and [[natural proof]]s for proving general lower bounds.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Mulmuley|first=Ketan D.|date=2011-04-01|title=On P vs. NP and geometric complexity theory: Dedicated to Sri Ramakrishna|url=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1944345.1944346|journal=Journal of the ACM
== References ==
Line 25 ⟶ 27:
K. D. Mulmuley, H. Narayanan, and M. Sohoni. Geometric complexity theory III: on deciding nonvanishing of a Littlewood-Richardson coefficient. J. Algebraic Combin. 36 (2012), no. 1, 103–110.
K. D. Mulmuley. Geometric Complexity Theory V:
K. D. Mulmuley. Geometric Complexity Theory VI: the flip via positivity., Technical Report, Computer Science department, The University of Chicago, January 2011.
Line 32 ⟶ 34:
* [http://gct.cs.uchicago.edu/ GCT page, University of Chicago]
* [http://simons.berkeley.edu/workshop_alggeometry1.html Description on the Simons Institute webpage]
* [
* [
* [https://mathoverflow.net/
* https://mathoverflow.net/questions/243011/why-should-algebraic-geometers-and-representation-theorists-care-about-geometric/
[[Category:Computational complexity theory]]
|