CltFn

Revision as of 08:17, 6 November 2006

Revision as of 23:01, 18 December 2006

Line 1:

The [[Bolshevik]] leader [[Vladimir Lenin]] returned to the capital of Russia, [[Petrograd]], on April 3, 1917, just over a month following the February Revolution which had brought about the establishment of the liberal Provisional Government. He set out his analysis of where Russian politics should develop in his famous '''April Theses''' published in the newspaper, Pravda. The theses dealt with various areas - for instance, the Bolshevik attitude to the [[First World War]], their attitude to the Provisional Government, and how Russia should be governed in the future and the future of the Bolsheviks.

*[[User talk:CltFn\Archive 1]]

*[[User talk:CltFn\Archive 2]]

*[[User talk:CltFn\Archive 3]]

*[[User talk:CltFn\Archive 4]]

*[[User talk:CltFn\Archive 5]]

Particular measures proposed by Lenin included no co-operation with the "[[bourgeois]]" Provisional Government; opposition to the war on the grounds that it was a war fought in bourgeois interests by bourgeois governments; and the abolition of the police, army and state bureaucracy which he argued held up the interests of Russia's ruling bourgeosie. Lenin also argued against parliamentary democracy and called for workers control of the state through the system of [[soviet (council)|soviets]]. Lenin also appealed to the popular peasant demands of the time and stated in his theses and stated that land should be given to the peasants.

==[[WP:AGF]]==

Wikipedia guidelines dictate that you '''[[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]]''' in dealing with other editors. Please stop being [[Wikipedia:Civility|uncivil]] to your fellow editors, and assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:agf3 --> [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 20:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

:I'm not required to assume good faith of you, because you are a sockpuppeteer. Please read the policy. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 20:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

::When did I say I'm exempt from policy? [[WP:AGF]] states "This policy does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary. Actions inconsistent with good faith include vandalism, sockpuppetry, and lying." so it's part of policy that I'm not required to assume good faith of you. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 20:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

:::My accusations are not without merit. Please take a look at your userpage. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 20:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

::::Had you not been caught, you would have continued to use the sockpuppet, as you did for many months. It is hardly "the past." Again, I'm not required to assume good faith of sockpuppeteers. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 20:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

:::::You make a lot of accusations, but you don't show too much proof. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 20:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

::::::That is precisely what I'm saying. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 20:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

In the theses Lenin also argued that the time had come for the Bolsheviks to consider changing their name to disassociate them from mainstream European social-democracy as he felt this term was devalued by many leading social-democrats supporting their respective country's participation in the war. This was an argument he first developed in his 1915 pamphlet Socialism and War where he called the pro-war social-democrats Social-Chauvinists.

== Blocked ==

Many of the arguments laid out by Lenin in his theses were aimed directly at the Bolsheviks themselves as much as the wider population. After the events of the February revolution returning Bolshevik leaders from exile such as [[Josef Stalin]] and [[Lev Kamenev]] were arguing a much more moderate line,that Russian involvement in the war could be justified and that there should be co-operation with the liberals. However, Lenin's arguments reflected those made by the leading Bolsheviks in Petrograd at the time of the February events, such as [[Alexander Shlyapnikov]].

More edit warring on multiple articles, after your previous week-long block and many, many bocks before. I'm reblocking for two weeks this time. You ''must'' stop edit warring if you want to continue editing at Wikipedia. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 20:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|I was reverting on a living bio , to remove unsubstantiated , POV motivated material and per the biography tag the 3 RR does not apply|2=Okay, first of all, your extreme history of edit warring has set you up for this 2 week block. Stop now, seriously. Do not edit war. You can be blocked permanently if you exhaust the community's patience and you are on your way. Second, even after over a dozen blocks you have violated the [[WP:3RR]] again. You KNOW it's against the rules, yet you still do it. Furthermore, you were not reverting vandalism, you were edit warring. Shape up. Reverting is very unhelpful to the editing process. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]^{[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]} 15:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)}}

Lenin succeeded in persuading the Bolsheviks of his arguments as laid out in the April Theses and they provided much of the ideological groundwork for the events leading up to their ascendency to power in the October Revolution.

:Yes, it does. [[WP:VAND]] states that ''"Though [WP:NPOV additions are] inappropriate, this is '''not''' vandalism."'' (emphasis mine) . [[WP:3RR]] states ''"In cases of [[Wikipedia:Vandalism#Types_of_vandalism|'''simple''' vandalism]] that is clearly not a content dispute"'' (emphasis existing in current policy). Therefore, you don't fall under the banner of reverting vandalism as an exception to the 3RR. I ask the administrator who judges this RFU take into account these facts from official policy, as well as this users' extensive block log for edit-warring, 3RR violations and other similar offences in the past. <font face="sans-serif">'''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel]][[Special:Random|.]][[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|Bryant]]'''</font> 07:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

{{Uncategorized|November 2006}}

'''Note to the reviewing admin'''.

*Please review my (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/CltFn) edits and you will see that they are not vandalism or edits in bad faith.

*User BhaiSaab has for quite some time now has been following my edits trail and blanking them out or reverting them, and this is exactly what he did yesterday.

*Yes I was accused in the past of having multiple accounts , and I was blocked for that. I learned the lesson and fullfilled the block period, but I expected a fresh start having paid the penalty. But at soon as I came back BhaiSaab began reverting all my edits, reverting them and outright stating that he does not need to assume good faith with me, but I should assume good faith with him. Check the my talk page for latest discussions with BhaiSaab.

[[Category:History of Russia]]

*Bahai got blocked for 24 hours and I get 2 weeks? How is that fair? '''We should both get the same block length for the same accusation'''!--[[User:CltFn|CltFn]] 14:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed| I have been advised by admin netsnipe to file a second unblock request

* I was following the [[WP:BLP]] rule , reverting unsourced , data from a living bio, and understood that the 3RR rule is overidden in those circumstances.

*Please review my (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/CltFn) edits and you will see that they are not vandalism or edits in bad faith.

*It should be taken into consideration that User BhaiSaab has for quite some time now has been following my edits trail and blanking them out or reverting them PURPOSEFULLY in bad faith. He openly admits that this is what he is doing see talk page above.

*BahaSaab who was counter reverting me only got blocked for 24 hours and I got 2 weeks? That is not fair '''We should both get the same block length for the same accusation''' |decline=Given the apparent determination to continue the edit war and CltFn's refusal to accept that there is any problem with his actions, a block is self-evidently warranted. The history at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:CltFn] clearly shows that CltFn is under the wholly mistaken impression that revert warring is an acceptable way to pursue a content dispute despite previous warnings and blocks. [[WP:BLP]] does not apply in this case as the claim that Winn is self-published is backed by reliable sources. CltFn also reinserted a huge block of external links, depracated by [[WP:EL|the link guideline]]. CltFn also appears to perceive his own biases as neutral and shows all the signs of being a [[Wikipedia:Tendentious editors|tendentious editor]]; an enforced break to cool off seems eminently sensible. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> 10:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)}}

[[cs:Dubnové teze]]

"He openly admits that this is what he is doing see talk page above."

:Please do not lie. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 15:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

==Bat Ye'or==

Is she dead? [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 05:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

:You removed from her from the living persons category. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 05:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

::Yes it's supposed to go on everyone that is living for the purposes of following [[WP:BLP]]. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] ^{[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]} 05:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

== [[Asra Nomani]] Images ==

Hi. I saw nothing on the site that says that they are anything but copyrighted. That means (unless you can get them to somehow release the images as free which I doubt will happen) you can only use them under fair use. That means you could read over [[WP:FUC]]. Sadly, I doubt they can be used because they aren't even really promotional pictures since they are released by the university for the event. I also don't think we can stretch it to historic event (like the copyright tag used for [[:Image:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg]]) because... well, it appears that there were four people praying with her and what Amina Wadud did got far more press. I doubt there is much that can be used from there... but, there is probably some place (maybe on the FUC talk page) that you can ask more knowledgeable people.

I'll take a look at that AfD ... but, I'm not sure if I'll weigh in, yet. [[User:Grenavitar|gren]] [[User talk:Grenavitar|グレン]] 10:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

== Keep on Truckin' ==

You might be too young to get the cultural ref but I just thought you might like a few kind words. I certainly am seeing a pattern here in the way contributors are treated. Clearly some points of view are more equal than others. Hang in there.[[User:AnneCr|AnneCr]] 02:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

:I second that. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 08:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the Bat Yeor article, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bat_Ye%27or#Thomas_Jones_Review. [[User:Tidaress|Tidaress]] 09:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

== Spencer ==

Please don't remove the criticisms of Spencer --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 09:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

==afd==

Hi. I have afd'd your article at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti Dhimmitude]]. Peace. --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 10:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

==Hello==

You don't know me, but I have noticed that you have had troubles with [[User:BhaiSaab]] in the past.He has filed an RfA against me:

[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Hkelkar]]

And the question of his extreme partisanship has been raised by an admin.If you would like to contribute to that page then please do. Thanks.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 00:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

::Thanks for your post to my RfA. I appreciate it.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 07:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

== Your posts on [[WP:AN]] ==

I had deleted that page, but some other users did not agree to it; so I undeleted it again. Please proceed with an MfD for that page and put up all the evidence of solicitation, and notify me on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash; [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<font color="black">Nearly Headless Nick</font>]]<span class="plainlinks"> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Sir+Nicholas+de+Mimsy-Porpington <font color="black" title="Admin actions">^'''{L}'''</font>]</span> 15:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

<!--

:< !-- Please do not remove or change this MfD message during the discussion. -- >

<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="mfd" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #D0ECDD; border: 1px solid #539570; text-align: left; font-size:95%;">

'''This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]][[Template:md|.]]'''

{{#if:{{{1|}}}|This nomination is part of a discussion of several related miscellaneous pages.}}<br />

Please discuss the matter at '''[[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild/Articles for deletion (second nomination)|this page's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|Miscellany for Deletion]] page.<br />

You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move this page (without knowing exactly what you are doing), or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|Guide to Deletion]].<br/>

''<small>[[Wikipedia:Maintenance|Maintenance]] use only: {{tls|md1}} &#123;{subst:md2|pg={{FULLPAGENAME}}|text=}} &#123;{subst:md3|pg={{FULLPAGENAME}}}} [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion|action=edit&section=2}} log] </small></div>

<div class="NavContent" style="display:none;background:#D0ECDD;">

{{MfD doc}}

</div></div></div></div>

{{{category|[[Category:Miscellaneous pages for deletion]]}}}

< !-- End of MfD message. Feel free to edit beyond this point. -- >

-->

:Mm, I hope you don't mind this on your page. Copy the code and post this on the page for deletion and then follow the instructions that follow on [[WP:MFD]]. Please endeavour to produce all the evidence you can. Thank you. &mdash; [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<font color="black">Nearly Headless Nick</font>]]<span class="plainlinks"> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Sir+Nicholas+de+Mimsy-Porpington <font color="black" title="Admin actions">^'''{L}'''</font>]</span> 17:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

::Remove this template from your page when the work is done. Thanks. &mdash; [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<font color="black">Nearly Headless Nick</font>]]<span class="plainlinks"> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Sir+Nicholas+de+Mimsy-Porpington <font color="black" title="Admin actions">^'''{L}'''</font>]</span> 17:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:::You need to produce the evidence (diffs) like you did the last time. &mdash; [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<font color="black">Nearly Headless Nick</font>]]<span class="plainlinks"> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Sir+Nicholas+de+Mimsy-Porpington <font color="black" title="Admin actions">^'''{L}'''</font>]</span> 10:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

== Moving pages ==

Please refrain from renaming pages by cutting and pasting their content into a new place. There is a move tab available for you to use, and using it moves the edit history of the article to the new name. If a page cannot be moved, please use [[WP:RFPM]] or ask an administrator. It is also a good idea to wait for consensus before moving pages. Thanks. _{[[User:J Di|JD]]}^{[[User talk:J Di|talk]]} 12:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

:Please reply to messages here, not on my talk page. The sockpuppet thing was an accident, I was thinking about something else at the time. Sorry. About the page, I'm not going to move it so I'm suggesting you read [[WP:RM#Steps for requesting a (possibly) controversial page move|this section]] of [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]], as the move you are proposing appears to be controversial. If you read the first few paragraphs of the article, you'll see that female genital mutilation is a term used by people opposed to the act of genital mutilation. Female genital cutting appears to be a neutral name; but I am not an expert on the subject. _{[[User:J Di|JD]]}^{[[User talk:J Di|talk]]} 12:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)