Cell microprocessor implementations: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Craig.Scott (talk | contribs)
This article is not actively under construction any more
Line 1:
{| class="messagebox" id="inuse" style="border: 1px solid #5A8261; background-color: #CCFFCC;"
|-
|align="center" width="1%"|[[Image:Crystal 128 clock.png|center|30px]]
|align="center" width="60%"|'''This sub-article is under construction.<br><small>''A recent, fully-intact main article can be viewed at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cell_microprocessor&oldid=57781754 oldid=57781754].</small>''
Contributions are welcome at [[cell microprocessor]].<br>If you wish to help with the creation of this subarticle, please see [[Talk:cell microprocessor]] to avoid creating edit conflicts.
|}
 
==Implementation==
{{Cell microprocessor segments}}
Line 124 ⟶ 117:
|}
 
The entry for 2.0  GHz operation at 0.9 V represents a low power configuration. Other entries show the peak stable operating frequency achieved with each voltage increment. As a general rule in CMOS circuits, power dissipation rises in a rough relationship to V^2 * F, the square of the voltage times the operating frequency.
 
Though the wattage measurements provided by the IBM authors lack precision they convey a good sense of the overall trend. These figures show the part is capable of running above 5  GHz under test lab conditions--though at a die temperature too hot for standard commercial configurations. The first Cell processors made commercially available were rated by IBM to run at 3.2  GHz, an operating speed where this chart suggests a SPU die temperature in a comfortable vicinity of 30 degrees.
 
Note that a single SPU represents 6% of the Cell processor's die area. The wattage figures given in the table above represent just a small portion of the overall power budget.
 
===Future editions in CMOS===
IBM has publicly announced their intention to implement Cell on a future technology below the 90 nm node to improve power consumption. Reduced power consumption could ''potentially'' allow the existing design to be boosted to 5  GHz or above without exceeding the thermal constraints of existing products.
 
====Prospects at 65 nm====