Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding sheep: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Exploding sheep]]: delete per starblind |
|||
Line 8:
**'''Comment''' This article has existed in its current version for 3 years. During those 3 years the only reference that has been added is a link to a fansite that asserts no notability. [[WP:N]] and [[WP:RS]] are pretty clear on what makes a reliable source and how notability is asserted. In a situation like this a references tag is just a way to avoid AfD. I think we all know deep down that no one is going to add any references because you tag it. The backlog of unsourced articles is huge already. If sources are indeed available then there are 5 days to add them and the AfD template on the article is pretty hard to miss. [[User:MartinDK|MartinDK]] 21:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', there's nothing to establish this as a notable phenomenon any more than "blue car." We need sources talking about the subject, otherwise it's original research to consider it as a unified topic. [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] ([[User talk:Night Gyr|talk]]/[[User:Night Gyr/Over|Oy]]) 04:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Per Starblind. <font face="Trebuchet MS, Trebuchet"><i><b>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<font color="navy">—A</font> • <font color="red">D</font>]] </b></i></font><sup>[[User talk:Anonymous Dissident|<font color="black">'''Torque'''</font>]]</sup> 21:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
| |||