Talk:Object-oriented programming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 114:
 
[[User:MikeSchinkel|MikeSchinkel]] 02:19, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 
:No one mind your contribution. An attempt is more hopeful than giving up. I think four points you pointed out are quite accepted--that's what I have learned and have seen in many books of OOP. My intial motivation to omit them is I wanted to turn the article into more general term rather than common one. The explanation of polymorphism is a good instance. Not every OOP language has a data type. I mean when you teach OOP, it is inevitable to explain about porymophism but it is actually rather an implementation choice and detail. Anyway, this is my reason. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 02:39, Oct 26, 2003 (UTC)