Wikipedia:Lists of protected pages: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 116:
***Vandalism is something that happens. Sprotecting is not a cure for anonymous editing, and 6 'incidents' of vandalism in 10 hours is beneath any kind of problem threshold. Standard watchlisting and CVU work can handle this without even noticing. Unprotected, and should stay that way unless there is a serious vandalism problem of the kind that would necessitate vprotect. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 17:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
* {{article|50 Cent}} - Persistent vandalism. Over 95% of the past 500 edits were vandalism-related. [[User:Hall Monitor|Hall Monitor]] 17:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
*{{article|History of Gibraltar}} and {{article|Disputed status of Gibraltar}}. Great candidate for S-P. We have one blocked user (Gibraltarian) who keeps using dynamic IPs to POV push and vandalize. I tried a range block but that's not ideal. On the other hand, we have several good editors working on it who should have access to the article. Again. Great candidate. Hopefully it'll only be for a few days until he gives up. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|(cat scratches)]]</sup> 03:07, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
*{{article|John Kerry}} - it was unprotected for half an hour and started getting nailed again. Reprotected. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|(cat scratches)]]</sup> 03:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
|