Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 84.32.222.96 - "→Higher-order functions in C/C++: " |
|||
Line 224:
Functional languages must support first-class functions BY DESIGN (in language semantics itself),- not recursively/dynamically invoking compiler as in your example or not by doing some other metaprogramming stuff. Otherwise by using your logic we can conclude that ANY compiled language supports functional programming (or any other programming idiom, just by invoking compiler dynamically). Which will sound crazy [and leave language designers unemployed :) ], don`t you think ? So let`s face it - C/C++ was not designed as modern functional language, and it will stay as it is, unless ... will be re-designed by it`s designers :-) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.32.222.96|84.32.222.96]] ([[User talk:84.32.222.96|talk]]) 17:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||