Revision as of 18:36, 3 September 2016 edit Rahab rx (talk \| contribs) 80 edits →Language support breakdown of languages by taxonomy is misleading and irrelevant: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:36, 3 September 2016 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,679 edits m Signing comment by Rahab rx - "→Language support breakdown of languages by taxonomy is misleading and irrelevant: new section" Next edit →
Line 441: Language support for first class functions should not present a table grouping languages by family. It is not relevant to the topic but it is vague and at best arguable. Furthermore the specific taxonomy used is neither accurate nor intuitive with respect to first class functions. For example, one category is C Family and another is Scripting, while another is Functional. I suggest we remove the taxonomy from table and restructure the section. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rahab rx\|Rahab rx]] ([[User talk:Rahab rx\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rahab rx\|contribs]]) 18:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ~~I suggest we remove the taxonomy from table and restructure the section.~~

Talk:First-class function: Difference between revisions