Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeroad.com: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:31, 9 October 2016

Revision as of 16:00, 13 October 2016

Line 9:

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 13:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)</small>

*'''delete per nom''' it's been cleaned up since the PROD, but the sourcing is still really bad and too much of it actually fails verification - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 14:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' Sadly the company does find mention in the newspapers such as [[The Economic Times]], [[Mint (newspaper)]] and [[Hindustan Times]] which makes it notable according to [[WP:CORP]]

#[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/fashion-curation-apps-like-limeroad-withme-voonik-are-carving-a-business-out-of-recommending-what-to-wear/articleshow/52352645.cms Fashion curation apps like LimeRoad, WithMe, Voonik are carving a business out of recommending what to wear]

#[http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/indian-fashion-scrapbooking-site-limeroad-raises-30-million-dollar-series-c-115033100253_1.html Indian fashion scrapbooking site LimeRoad raises 30 million dollar Series C]

#[http://www.hindustantimes.com/business/limeroad-to-redemption-why-e-com-troubles-make-suchi-mukherjee-happy/story-sAUju0EJoWSvhCif0JAnuN.html LimeRoad to redemption: Why e-com troubles make Suchi Mukherjee happy]

#[http://www.livemint.com/Companies/mvuL9EUPb0SrAcpKbc8L4L/Fashion-etailer-Limeroad-enters-menswear-segment.html Fashion e-tailer Limeroad enters menswear segment]

:The title seems misleading. It should be renamed to [[Limeroad]] or [[LimeRoad]] (The choice of capital R in between is deliberate here going by some articles and .com only suggests its an e-commerce website). Also the "Partnerships,"Online Traffic" and " Awards and Recognition" parts of the article are unsalvageable. It seems to be a stub after all these editing but the company seems to pass the notability test as per the verifiable sources.