Government by algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 37:
{{Expand section|date=March 2020}}
 
The are also potential risks associated with the use of AI in government. Those include AI becoming susceptible to bias,<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://ash.harvard.edu/files/ash/files/artificial_intelligence_for_citizen_services.pdf|title=Artificial Intelligence for Citizen Services and Government|last=Mehr|first=Hila|date=August 2017|website=ash.harvard.edu|access-date=2018-12-31}}</ref> a lack of transparency in how an AI application may make decisions,<ref name=":6">{{Cite web|url=https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/10/ai-in-public-sector.pdf|title=Unleashing the potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector|last=Capgemini Consulting|date=2017|website=www.capgemini.com|access-date=2018-12-31}}</ref> and the accountability for any such decisions.<ref name=":6" /> There is also a serious concern that [[gaming the system|gaming]] by the regulated parties might occur.<ref name=sstandford/> If algorithmic governance brings more transparency into the decision making, regulated parties might try to manipulate their outcome in own favor and even use [[adversarial machine learning]].
 
==See also==