Content deleted Content added
→Description section issues: Reply |
→Description section issues: Reply |
||
Line 21:
:@[[User:Zlamma|Zlamma]], since you're here, do you have any thoughts about what to do with this 'Description' section? [[User:IntGrah|IntGrah]] ([[User talk:IntGrah|talk]]) 15:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
::Your impression about it being redundant seem justified to me, but I am not very experienced about what should or shouldn't be in an article. For what it's worth, I myself have never read the description when I came to this article to refresh my understanding - going straight to the Algorithm was sufficient, which adds to the redundancy vote, though I am a programmer - perhaps the Algorithm section isn't understandable to all, so maybe waiting for another voice here would make sense.
::Other than this, first thought I had when I saw how that section is written was that maybe that text should go to the 'Simple English' language version of the article (could even give an [[Help:Interlanguage links|Interlanguage link]] above the 'Algorithm', to make it discoverable). But I can see it does have a text similarly ill-styled in an Algorithm section already 🙂 [[User:Zlamma|Zlamma]] ([[User talk:Zlamma|talk]]) 00:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
== Algorithm > Pt. 4 (marking a visited) > claim of 'final and minimal' ==
| |||