Content deleted Content added
→Better visual proof: Reply |
|||
Line 102:
Thanks, '''[[User:cmglee|cmɢʟee]]''' [[User_Talk:cmglee|τaʟκ]] <span style="font-size:80%;">(please add <code>{{ping|cmglee}}</code> to your reply)</span> 00:38, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:It is a mess of faded colors, formulas, arrows, and upside down superscripted digits. I have no idea what it is supposed to mean. And the whole idea of proofs without words is that they are not supposed to need any text to explain them; your figure is covered all over with text (the formulas and digits). The color combinations are a blatant violation of [[MOS:ACCESSIBILITY]], which is not optional. Only the outline in the central part of it resembles in any way the source image you give, which is clear and simple. All your additions to it compromise the legibility of the image and constitute [[WP:OR]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 00:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
::{{ping|David Eppstein}} Thanks for the feedback. I tried to explain the source image clearer and make it different so not infringe copyright. If I redrew it as in the original with accessible colours, would it be acceptable? '''[[User:cmglee|cmɢʟee]]''' [[User_Talk:cmglee|τaʟκ]] <span style="font-size:80%;">(please add <code>{{ping|cmglee}}</code> to your reply)</span> 09:49, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||