Content deleted Content added
→Better visual proof: Reply |
→Better visual proof: Reply |
||
Line 104:
::{{ping|David Eppstein}} Thanks for the feedback. I tried to explain the source image clearer and make it different so not infringe copyright. If I redrew it as in the original with accessible colours, would it be acceptable? '''[[User:cmglee|cmɢʟee]]''' [[User_Talk:cmglee|τaʟκ]] <span style="font-size:80%;">(please add <code>{{ping|cmglee}}</code> to your reply)</span> 09:49, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:::Without all the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was? Maybe. But is it really different from the existing better image [[:File:Nicomachus theorem 3D.svg]] (with its flat part copied four times, mirrored horizontally and vertically)? —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 17:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
::::{{ping|David Eppstein}} The 2D version shows why it is always possible to go from the ''n''th to the (''n'' + 1)th term, while the 3D version (which I drew over 10 years ago, incidentally) doesn't quite show that (I just shows that it's possible for the first five terms). Nevertheless, if it's just a maybe, I can't be assured that it will be time worth spending. Thanks for your attention, '''[[User:cmglee|cmɢʟee]]''' [[User_Talk:cmglee|τaʟκ]] <span style="font-size:80%;">(please add <code>{{ping|cmglee}}</code> to your reply)</span> 22:51, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||