Revision as of 23:41, 24 October 2003 edit TakuyaMurata (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers 92,676 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:48, 25 October 2003 edit undo Jamesday (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 4,561 edits comment to Taku Next edit →
Line 101: :You have a point. My apology for stating OOP as style. Now I think the intro and the definition section is good enough, it is time to rework more following details. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata\|Taku]] Taku, The dispute between us is not about the definition of OOP. I think we agree well enough on that paradigm and the elements section described in this article. My disagreement is with you saying that a structured programming design (the Windows API) was originally designed as an OOP design. The two are different concepts. OOP includes structured programming as one of its component concepts but that doesn't make all structured design OOP design. [[User:JamesDay\|JamesDay]] 20:48, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Talk:Object-oriented programming: Difference between revisions