Revision as of 10:54, 2 November 2003 edit MikeSchinkel (talk \| contribs) 215 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:37, 3 January 2004 edit undo Doradus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 6,033 edits "Real-world objects" Next edit →
Line 137: ... well, google helped: http://www.pasteur.fr/~letondal/object-based.html (Object-based PLs). OScheme would be a good example, and its interesting because it's untyped, I think. I guess that's the functional one I was thinking of. [[User:Brent Gulanowski\|Brent Gulanowski]] 18:53, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC) [[User:Brent Gulanowski\|Brent Gulanowski]] 18:53, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC) ---- If we must talk about OOP modelling the "real world" then can we please do it less prominently? OOP applies quite well in situations where there is no "real world" (eg. nodes in a control-flow graph) so I don't consider real-world fidelity to be very important at all. However, some disagree, so if someone feels like putting that back in, I won't remove it again. --[[User:P3d0\|P3d0]] 13:37, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Talk:Object-oriented programming: Difference between revisions