Content deleted Content added
→worst-case analysis: new section |
→OK done big edit: new section |
||
Line 197:
The article does a poor job in failing to point out it is heavily biased towards [[worst-case analysis]]/[[worst-case complexity]] (and there are no articles explaining this concept). I threw in a phrase into the overview section, but someone has to make a prominent point on the issue in the article, since this is a fundamental concept. Probably a whole section about worst/case/average caes, upper/lower bounds, etc. Unfortunately I am not a man for the job. [[User:Twri|Twri]] ([[User talk:Twri|talk]]) 19:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
== OK done big edit ==
I think this is better now but is nowhere near perfect; I hope at least it gives something for others to get hold of.
I think there are two main problems:
*NP problem is covered too much, it has its own article. I have tidied it up with the view that much of it may be merged with that article.
*Laziness by previous editors in adding references but not properly. Takes me forever, I have done some but there are plenty left where the article proper gives a link but not as a ref.
Hope on the whole it is an improvement.
[[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 03:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
| |||