Content deleted Content added
Karel Bílek (talk | contribs) |
→maybe because there noting wrong worth mentioning: it's all history now. |
||
Line 375:
: So, at least, include some part, explaining or mentioning, why is Ada NOT widely used today. (It is not.) Are there historical reasons - and FUD? Probably ... but it should be, at least, mentioned. I won't do it, I don't have the needed knowledge. And I never said there is something ''substantially wrong with Ada''. --''[[Aum|Have a nice day]]''. [[User:Running|Running]] 19:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:: I love to. But you know, the main reason that most new Projects in our company are done in Java is the ''"replaceable-ability"'' of Java-programmers. Yes Hire and Fire as main reason for choosing a programming language. And this is Switzerland where people are nice to each other. But ranting about the management won't be very helpful explanation.
:: Well maybe I can still fit something into the history section why Ada had slow to start and was never quite able to acquire the critical mass to become a "mass-market" programming language. --[[User:Krischik|Krischik]] <sup>[[User_talk:Krischik|T]]</sup> 07:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
| |||