Talk:Risch algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Claims: good; command?
Gaz v pol (talk | contribs)
Line 138:
 
:::: Not a problem. Would you also paste the Maple command you're using on [[User:CRGreathouse/Risch|my page]]? That way others can verify it more easily. I look forward to seeing what Maple 13 can do when you get access. [[User:CRGreathouse|CRGreathouse]]<small> ([[User talk:CRGreathouse|t]] | [[Special:Contributions/CRGreathouse|c]])</small> 15:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 
::::: I checked with Maple 13 under Windows 7 today. Results: first integral - with EllipticF (so Maple does not make use of the Galois group of the polynomial under sqrt), second - no success, third - full success. I have added results to your page, but not to the table (sorry, I feel not comfort with editing html). I can also check any other integral on Maple 13 by your request. Also I have tried SymPy with simular integrals but with change x to x-1. It gives me error. Either I have done something wrong with syntax (that's possible), or they just added this particular integral to their table :-). I suggest the following to be written on the page: 1'st integral can be done only by Axiom, second only by SymPy, and their sum can be done by no software as of June 2008. What do you think about this idea?[[User:Gaz v pol|Gaz v pol]] ([[User talk:Gaz v pol|talk]]) 15:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)