Content deleted Content added
Line 1:
==No rellay working.==
The difficulty onthe talk page is yor blatant willignness to decieve others abotu me usign the same tactic you claim I use againt Acharya. You claim that I am a covert Zelous Christain wantign to defame her, and you merley wish to defend the truth. We both know this isnt true James. You want peopel to beelive her ideas and are willignto do anyhtign to make her seem as imprsive as possibl an rmeove all oposiiton to her vies.
My Chrisytaintiy is sued asa blundgeoon. You make it osund as if I oppose Acharya base don my faiht, hate her, and vehemntly opose her, and htus want ot attakc her. You then claim the aritlce is written in sch a way that it attakcs her. No spacific exampels of attakc are shown gowever.
I can assure you, nothign ithe article that is the current ocncensus among the general posters ( As oppsoed ot the Acharyans) is derogatory towards her.
But yo wish to rmeove the links ot CHrisyain rebuttals and all critisms.
If Dorothy wants to attack Chrisgaunity, why has she then no supply of courage to stand up to their rebuttals?
Midn you, Im not th eon makign suh a rebuttal. THis is WIkipedia, and I am ever midnful fo the need tobe Unbiased. Thoughyou will nto accept hat form me.
This is why I think talkigto me on Yahoo woudl be mor eocnductive. Uou would not only getot know me,but also ge tot have liv interaction.
this wya, we can easily discuss, in real time, any and very issue.
The baords you wher invited ot to demonstrae you rown abyslam lack of undertanidng baout both Christendom, and myself. My invovlement on that baord shos how open midned I can be,a s itsamonght emost inclusive baords you can go. THe invitaitonstands alays, butthe raon I want you their now is to demonstrate how little bias their is.
I have fairly rtepresented Mromons, Catholcis, and Jehovahs witnesses. I haveeeven defended Elpidio and MyMindCore when they are misrepresented.
Alternate beelifs that disagree with me are discussed, not shunned. But what I have low tolerationfo is misleadignpeopel.
DOrothy is not a Historian, rleigiosuscholar, linguist,or archeologist. NEither is she anyhtign of particular note in academia. This si a fact, not a disparagy.
Her primary claim to fame is her wbsite and correlated books.
This makes ehr as I am. A proffesional writter, not an acadmic. (thoughIm enerign Acadmia.)
Likewise, As noted,and as you cansee for yorselfif you rmeove the filter, nothgin ibthe articl condmens her.
It is nto my way to condemn beelifs. But her acitosn, and yors, are condmend. You attemot to coerce Wikipedia into complaince to present an image that she desires presetned. This cannot stand.
And htus, my invovlement. After all, it is my article.
[[User:67.213.51.6|67.213.51.6]] 15:07, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
==James reply==
**forgid me for a minor edit. Wan tot keepthis orderly so moved yor reply.**
Zarove,
I think our differences are best discussed on Acharya's talk page. Perhaps I will drop by the Christian forum when we're done here. J▼
==Invitation.==
Line 12 ⟶ 71:
My address is Zaroff3.
▲Zarove,
▲I think our differences are best discussed on Acharya's talk page. Perhaps I will drop by the Christian forum when we're done here. J
==TO JAMES==
| |||