Revision as of 03:34, 21 November 2009 edit Jonovision (talk \| contribs) 454 edits not sure how this is POV -- the source article is strongly pro-Go! (also, from my understanding, the POV policy is intended to be inclusive, not exclusive) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:28, 21 November 2009 edit undo Aprock (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 9,805 edits Undid revision 327050396 by Jonovision (talk) if you really feel you must label this as obscure, bring to talk Next edit →
Line 23: }} '''Go!''' is an ~~obscure<ref>http://www.geek.com/articles/news/google-didnt-google-go-before-naming-their-programming-language-20091113/</ref>~~ [[Agent-based model\|agent-based]] programming language in the tradition of [[Logic programming\|logic-based programming]] languages like [[Prolog]].<ref>{{cite web\|last=Claburn \|first=Thomas \|url=http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/web_services/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221601351 \|title=Google 'Go' Name Brings Accusations Of 'Evil' \|publisher=InformationWeek \|date=2009-11-11 \|accessdate=2009-11-14}}</ref> It was introduced in a 2003 paper by Francis McCabe and [[Keith Clark]].<ref>Clark and McCabe, AAMAS'03, 2003</ref> Upon the November 2009 release of Google's [[Go (programming language)\|Go]] programming language (note lack of [[exclamation point]]) McCabe asked Google to change the name and accused the company of "steam-rollering over us".<ref>{{cite web\|last=Claburn \|first=Thomas \|url=http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/web_services/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221601351 \|title=Google 'Go' Name Brings Accusations Of 'Evil' \|publisher=InformationWeek \|date=2009-11-11 \|accessdate=2009-11-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web\|url=http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=9 \|title=Issue 9 - go - I have already used the name for MY programming language \|publisher=code.google.com \|date=2009-11-10 \|accessdate=2009-11-14}}</ref>

Go! (programming language): Difference between revisions