Revision as of 23:37, 13 February 2010 edit Tedickey (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 54,944 edits →Unreliable source cited in Article ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:06, 19 February 2010 edit undo Hcobb (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 14,765 edits →Unreliable source cited in Article: Who is better informed about the total impact of Ada? Next edit →
Line 427: :It's written as an opinion piece, not to be confused with a factual presentation. The thing to do would be to see what the wider context is, and also whether there are corrobating sources. [[User:Tedickey\|Tedickey]] ([[User talk:Tedickey\|talk]]) 23:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC) ::Sure. Let's get an opinion on Ada, by somebody who's managed a department with more projects with more total Ada programmers at work at them, than Michael Wynne. Go right ahead. [[User:Hcobb\|Hcobb]] ([[User talk:Hcobb\|talk]]) 02:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Ada (programming language): Difference between revisions