Content deleted Content added
Line 58:
== Citation from 2009? ==
Is that paper from 2009 really notable enough to warrant a citation in Wikipedia? It is used to make a fairly technical point. Since all other sources (besides Knuth, which is a reference work) are from the 60s, 70s, it makes the impression as if the latest paper would be the only continuation of the study of this algorithm, which is difficult to believe... that is, IMO it inflates the importance of the paper and the reference should be removed.
:While I understand your feelings about giving undue weight to that paper, I would suggest to add more references of recent date about the CYK algorithm. For instance, the CYK algorithm, as well as Valiant's improvement have been recently generalized from context-free grammars to the case of [[Boolean grammar]]s. Removing content from the article would certainly be a step into the wrong direction, given the size of the article. If there are any recent papers that deserve to be included, please [[Wikipedia:Be_bold|be bold]] and just go ahead. I am confident that the article will further expanded over time, given that the article's subject is covered in many textbooks and courses on automata theory. [[User:Hermel|Hermel]] ([[User talk:Hermel|talk]]) 21:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
|