Revision as of 00:58, 14 November 2010 edit Asmeurer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,059 edits m →Claims: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:27, 13 January 2011 edit undo 85.187.35.160 (talk) →Possibly an error? Next edit →
Line 56: ::Why not write it with the logarithms? Because I went to check Rosenlicht, and he stated the result in terms of ''f''. ::[[User:XaosBits\|XaosBits]] 01:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC) ::: In the current state of the article this formula is a little overcomplicated: why are there logarithms in the first place? If the formula is correct, then there's no need for logarithms, since the logarithm of an elementary function is an elementary function. ::: [[Special:Contributions/85.187.35.160\|85.187.35.160]] ([[User talk:85.187.35.160\|talk]]) 15:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC) == typo of some sort? ==

Talk:Risch algorithm: Difference between revisions