Revision as of 18:03, 18 April 2011 edit David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 235,670 edits →Python code: agree ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:25, 18 April 2011 edit undo Subh83 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,488 edits →Python code Next edit →
Line 44: - [[User:Subh83\| '''Subh83''']] <small>([[User_talk:Subh83\|talk]] \| [[User:Subh83/contribs\|contribs]])</small> 17:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC) :I don't agree that Python code is never justified on Wikipedia — often it can make a good alternative to pseudocode as a way of communicating the essence of an algorithm. But in this case I don't think it adds much to the pseudocode that is already here, especially since the style of writing gives up most of the advantages of conciseness and readability that Python usually has. So in this case I agree that it should be deleted. —[[User:David Eppstein\|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein\|talk]]) 18:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC) ::Removed it. <br/>Although I agree Python codes are quite intuitive in general, I am not sure if any specific language should be preferred since may programmers may not use that language and may be unfamiliar with the specific syntaxes. Also, preferred syntaxes may vary between versions of the programing language ([[Wikipedia:Algorithms_on_Wikipedia]]). - [[User:Subh83\| '''Subh83''']] <small>([[User_talk:Subh83\|talk]] \| [[User:Subh83/contribs\|contribs]])</small> 22:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Dijkstra's algorithm: Difference between revisions