Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11:
such as a piston pressing against the particles. The LSA is able to simulate
such a scenario <ref>Boris D. Lubachevsky and Frank H. Stillinger, Epitaxial frustration in deposited packings of rigid disks and spheres. Physical Review E 70:44, 41604 (2004) http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0405/0405650v5.pdf </ref>
<ref>
However,
the LSA was originally introduced in the setting
Line 74:
for spherical particles, though the spheres may be
of different sizes
<ref>
Any deviation from the spherical
(or circular in two dimensions) shape, even a simplest one, when spheres are replaced with ellipsoids (or ellipses in two dimensions)
<ref>
, causes thus modified LSA to slow down dramatically.
But as long as the shape is spherical,
Line 84:
on today's (2011) standard [[personal computers]].
Only a very limited experience was reported
<ref>
in using the LSA in dimensions higher than 3.
==Implementation (how the calculations are performed)==
Line 116:
Among the [[event-driven]] algorithms intended for
the same task of simulating [[granular flow]],
like, for example, the algorithm of D.C. Rapaport
<ref> D.C. Rapaport,
The Event Scheduling Problem in Molecular Dynamic Simulation,
Line 174:
simulations
as an "inelastic collapse"
<ref> S. McNamara,
Review E 50: pp. R28-R31, 1994
</ref>
Line 196:
[[Time Warp]] parallel simulation algorithm
by David Jefferson was advanced as a method
to simulate
asynchronous spacial pairwise interactions
in combat models on a [[parallel computer]].
<ref>
F. Wieland, and D. Jefferson,
Case studies in serial and parallel simulations,
Proc. 1989 Int'l Conf. Parallel Processing,
Vol.III, F. Ris,
</ref>
Colliding particles models
|