Content deleted Content added
→Requested move: weak support |
→Requested move: weak support |
||
Line 145:
*'''<s>Meh</s>''' '''Weak support''' In my experience "fixed point combinator" is more common than "fixed-point combinator". Google Scholar seems to confirm this [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22fixed-point+combinator%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=&as_vis=0], although the margins are not very wide. I would have to consult a few standard references first to form a strong opinion, as those would carry more weight. English is not my native language, but isn't there are rule for (not) using a hyphen for words of the form "(''adjective'' ''noun'') ''noun''" where (''adjective'' ''noun'') is used as an adjective? —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 12:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
**Your opinion is no less valid as a second-language speaker, Ruud. Where minority usage out there accords with WP's in-house style, we usually go with it, favouring internal consistency over inconsistency with ''some'' external sources. Here, there's a good reason to hyphenate, especially for non-experts: is it a point combinator that is fixed? And it's a compound adjective, isn't it, qualifying "combinator" the noun? "Point" might be a noun on the second "rank", but that's within the compound adjective. [[User:Tony1|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 12:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
*** I checked the indexes of a few of the books on my shelf and found one instance of "fixed-point combinator" and two of "[[fixed point theorem]]". The hyphenated could possibly be less ambiguous for some people. You might want to check with [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics]] before (or after ;) moving all the theorems, though. Common spellings of obscure names don't always agree with common sense. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 19:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
| |||