Revision as of 11:23, 11 October 2013 edit Improbable keeler (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,807 edits →Dual notation ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:27, 11 October 2013 edit undo Improbable keeler (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,807 edits →Dual notation Next edit →
Line 47: ==Dual notation== The different interpretations of point processes as random sets and counting measures is captured with the often used notation <ref name="stoyan1995stochastic"/><ref name="moller2003statistical"/><ref name="BB1"> F. Baccelli and B. B{\l}aszczyszyn. ''Stochastic Geometry and Wireless Networks, Volume I --- Theory'', volume 3, No 3--4 of ''Foundations and Trends in Networking''. NoW Publishers, 2009.</ref> in which: * <math> \Phi</math> isdenotes a set of random points. * <math> \Phi(B)</math> isdenotes a random variable that gives the number of points of <math> \Phi</math> in <math> B</math> (hence it is a random counting measure). Denoting the counting measure again with <math> \#</math>, this new dual notation would imply:

Point process notation: Difference between revisions