Content deleted Content added
Adding class, importance & field to maths rating template |
No edit summary |
||
Line 57:
:Very interesting, but we're only supposed to put things into the article that are supported by published sources, see [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. People's own thoughts have no place in the encyclopaedia no matter how good they are, see [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Dmcq|Dmcq]] ([[User talk:Dmcq|talk]]) 20:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
::This my work is currently being published on italian magazine. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ancora Luciano|Ancora Luciano]] ([[User talk:Ancora Luciano|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ancora Luciano|contribs]]) 08:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Honestly, the evaluation of these limits is a standard exercise of calculus. No more reasons to be included in any encyclopaedia, than the evaluation of 129+934. It's a computation. Just apply the definition of Riemann integral for x<sup>k</sup>. [[User:PMajer|pm]][[User talk:PMajer|<span style="color:blue;">a</span>]] 00:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
| |||