Revision as of 00:22, 19 November 2013 edit PMajer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,059 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:39, 16 April 2016 edit undo 1.162.222.80 (talk) →Probabilistic Interpretation?: new section Next edit →
Line 58: ::This my work is currently being published on italian magazine. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ancora Luciano\|Ancora Luciano]] ([[User talk:Ancora Luciano\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ancora Luciano\|contribs]]) 08:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :::Honestly, the evaluation of these limits is a standard exercise of calculus. No more reasons to be included in any encyclopaedia, than the evaluation of 129+934. It's a computation. Just apply the definition of Riemann integral for x<sup>k</sup>. [[User:PMajer\|pm]][[User talk:PMajer\|<span style="color:blue;">a</span>]] 00:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC) == Probabilistic Interpretation? == The LHS indeed is correct, but the RHS doesn't make any sense.

Talk:Squared triangular number: Difference between revisions