Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunctions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:10, 29 April 2016

Revision as of 19:51, 1 May 2016

Line 2:

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|f}}

:{{la|Patafunctions}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunctions|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 AprilMay 231#{{anchorencode:Patafunctions}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Patafunctions Stats]</span>)

:({{Find sources AFD|Patafunctions}})

This is a very carefully written article with lots of references that seeks to prop up a single work by an artist. The problem is that the text is loaded with references to anything other than the work itself, which has very dubious notability as it is essentially a small run publication for an exhibtion. Article is a huge long essay essentially. Article creator has user name shockingly similar to Author of Patafunctions. With all the obfuscation goign on, like with COI. I suggest it is better ot blow this one out of the water and start over-- if needed. (the same may also be true of the gigantic [[Shaun Gladwell]] page. There seems to be abit of a campaign going on. ) [[User:HappyValleyEditor|HappyValleyEditor]] ([[User talk:HappyValleyEditor|talk]]) 15:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Line 21:

::'''Comment''' This article features the clearest description of this book/artwork but cannot be used due to its Author's COI and clearly placed disclosure statement at the top of the article. Kit Messham-Muir is the self appointed 'official' Gladwell biographer/interlocuter/collaborator. http://theconversation.com/shaun-gladwell-is-returning-to-sydney-and-may-not-shed-tears-37348 Other forums are debating the books content rather than seeing it as an artwork etc. [[User:Gladderz|Gladderz]] ([[User talk:Gladderz|talk]]) 12:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as it's too soon to suggest a solidly notable article. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 06:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />

<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]}</span></span> 19:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Patafunctions]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->