Content deleted Content added
m Sentence casing for sub-section titles, as per WP:STYLE. Expansion. |
m →Comparison with other frameworks: Ref. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ember.js> and <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KnockoutJS>. Applied WP:CONTRACTION. |
||
Line 96:
Some of Vue’s syntax will look very similar to AngularJS (e.g. <code>v-if</code> vs <code>ng-if</code>). This is because there were a lot of things that AngularJS got right and these were an inspiration for Vue very early in its development. There are also many pains that come with AngularJS however, where Vue has attempted to offer a significant improvement.
=== Ember.js ===
Ember.js is a full-featured framework that is designed to be highly opinionated. It provides a lot of established conventions and once you are familiar enough with them, it can make you very productive. However, it also means the learning curve is high and flexibility suffers.
That said, it would probably make a better comparison between Vue core and
* Vue provides unobtrusive reactivity on plain JavaScript objects and fully automatic computed properties. In Ember.js, you need to wrap everything in Ember.js Objects and manually declare dependencies for computed properties.
* Vue’s template syntax harnesses the full power of JavaScript expressions, while Handlebars’ expression and helper syntax is intentionally quite limited in comparison.
* Performance-wise, Vue outperforms Ember.js by a fair margin, even after the latest Glimmer engine update in Ember.js 2.0. Vue automatically batches updates, while in Ember.js you need to manually manage run loops in performance-critical situations.
===
Over time though,
There also seem to be philosophical differences in the API design which if
=== Polymer ===
|