Talk:Dijkstra's algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m change "H" to lowercase "h"
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Dijkstra's algorithm/Archive 2) (bot
Line 20:
 
The terminology in the caption for the animation is not in full agreement with the description of the algorithm: (a) the algorithm description does not mention a "tentative set" - it does mention "tentative distances", and it mentions an "unvisited set"; (b) the algorithm description mentions no "heuristic", but the caption to the animation says that the algorithm uses a "heuristic that is identically zero". At first it seemed to me that the caption of the animation intended "tentative set" to mean that which is meant by "unvisited set" in the algorithm description, but as I thought about it, I am unsure; on the other hand, it seems clear to me that even if that is not the intent of the caption, it '''does''' follow that the "tentative set" is identical to the "unvisited set" in that example. Matt Insall 13:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Espresso-hound|Espresso-hound]] ([[User talk:Espresso-hound#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Espresso-hound|contribs]]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Pronunciation of the inventor's name ==
Could we add the correct phonetical expression for the inventors name? Anyone researching for this topic will have trouble to pronounce the name correctly. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A02:8109:80C0:7EC:E8F6:F2B8:8896:A526|2A02:8109:80C0:7EC:E8F6:F2B8:8896:A526]] ([[User talk:2A02:8109:80C0:7EC:E8F6:F2B8:8896:A526|talk]]) 10:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Description: "Pencil arrows" vs. "parents" ==
A paragraph in the Description advises "in pencil, mark the road with an arrow pointing to the relabeled intersection." The next paragraph talks about a visited node's "parent." I think these are talking about the same thing, but it's not very clear. Perhaps better wording might be "by following the nodes' parents ''(that is, traversing the arrows backward)''", or perhaps in the first paragraph, "mark the road with an arrow pointing to the relabeled intersection ''(from 'parent' to 'child')''"
--[[User:Jackrepenning|Jackrepenning]] ([[User talk:Jackrepenning|talk]]) 18:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 
== Complexity with Fibonacci heaps ==