Revision as of 00:24, 6 March 2019 edit Pythoncoder (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 26,433 edits more or less finished now ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:09, 6 March 2019 edit undo Pythoncoder (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 26,433 edits rfb Next edit →
Line 2: The following is adapted from [[User:TonyBallioni/RfA criteria\|TonyBallioni]]’s RfA criteria: #1. Not a [[wp:JERK\|jerk]] #2. Has a [[wp:CLUE\|clue]] #3. 1 year / 1000 edits (more concrete version of “have a record”) Remember to read the [[Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates]] page. Update 03:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC): The unthinkable has happened. Someone is [[WP:RFB\|running for bureaucrat]]. Okay, for bureaucrats, there’s one more criterion: 4. Has been a competent admin RfA is a terrible process because it's so hard to pass. Jimbo said "adminship isn't a big deal", but RfA has become one. Let's change that.

User:Pythoncoder/RfA criteria: Difference between revisions