Content deleted Content added
Rickthegeek (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 27:
I dusted off my Wikipedia account to add that while I am hardly an expert, I have known individuals that have used RPM to communicate, and it is amazing to see the communication taking place. I understand that the system may be considered "unscientific" but the results I have seen - with my own eyes - are very real, and that this article should be recast in a more positive (or at least open-minded) light.
[[User:Rickthegeek|Rickthegeek]] ([[User talk:Rickthegeek|talk]]) 13:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
:Because of your personal experiences with your own eyes - you think we should overturn science? Maybe you should read the RPM and FC page fully first. I've heard this argument before, some fan of a psychic says they have seen readings that were so spot on that "there was NO WAY the psychic could have know" and so therefore we should "go easy" on the psychic. Or "my friend's son got sick after a vaccination, therefore we should change the page for vaccines". Wikipedia does not work that way, we can't rely on "personal experience" and "what happens before your eyes". When RPM is tested by science under controlled conditions (just like we would expect with any new medical procedure) then this is published in a reliable source then Wikipedia can report the results on the Wikipedia article. That's how it works here. [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 16:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
| |||