Content deleted Content added
re-add 2x reverted intro |
A quick "comment" about the recently reverted contents |
||
Line 13:
Can someone please explain what is incorrect about the intro section as of my last edit? It was done to improve the article clarity and accuracy, but reverted twice without any discussion, and without fixing the existing deficiencies that I and another editor addressed previously. It is good to see this article move forward with discussion and consensus, let's keep up the good work, Thanks! [[User:Dreftymac|dr.ef.tymac]] 11:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
== A quick "comment" about the recently reverted contents ==
Hi guys,
I have quite a lot to catch up on the discussion we began on this (BTW, did it end? I see that editing is in progress) but really the point that comments are not part of the source code is ridiculous (the assertion that comments "are ignored" is close to meaningless too if one has a minimal idea of how a parser works, but that's what one usually gets when trying to explain things in a (over-)"simplified" way). Don't be offended, but could I ask those who are not programmers to refrain from adding to this article? —[[User:Gennaro Prota|<span style="color: #000080; font-weight: bold">Gennaro Prota</span>]][[User talk:Gennaro Prota|<sup style="color: #006400">•Talk</sup>]] 11:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
| |||