User contributions for Gnip

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

21:3121:31, 29 December 2007 diff hist +793 Talk:Chinese treasure ship →Peacock terms
06:0406:04, 29 December 2007 diff hist +290 Talk:Ming dynasty →Stick a fork in it, it's done!
04:1304:13, 29 December 2007 diff hist −44 Zheng He →Past Chronicles
04:1104:11, 29 December 2007 diff hist +77 Zheng He →Modern Scholastic Study of Ship Dimension
03:5303:53, 29 December 2007 diff hist +52 Paddle steamer Added some corrections and more detail

22:3422:34, 28 December 2007 diff hist +122 Zheng He More POV. The largest Treasure ship dock was as large as 500 meters. That's enough for 3 of the largest treasure ships. Replaced it with critics from professionals in the area
22:0922:09, 28 December 2007 diff hist −9 Zheng He Removed POV. One must let the reader decide on this.
06:1006:10, 28 December 2007 diff hist −475 Chinese treasure ship It's carrying capacity of 1500 tons, not ship's weight. Look, I agree that Zheng He's ship length is exaggerated, but use the proper arguments. Don't stuff imaginary words into so many sources people.
06:0606:06, 28 December 2007 diff hist −473 Zheng He Again, don't give a source and give false information on what they say(whoever you are), it's not ethical. It's either that or copying things from reader's critique from amazon. Tsk tsk. Not a source
05:5805:58, 28 December 2007 diff hist −550 Zheng He Wrong, wrong, and wrong. There is no tablet of Zheng He that stated the ship's volume, nor any indication that the Ming Shi was based on a novel. It's either misusing the sources or plain POV eh?
05:5205:52, 28 December 2007 diff hist −106 Zheng He The given sources and the statements made from these sources doesn't match at all! 1500 is the carrying capacity, not weight! Removing POV
05:2005:20, 28 December 2007 diff hist −161 Chinese treasure ship Just found out that the "source" from a particular sentence was actually from a reader's critique in Amazon, word for word. Replaced it with a more credible critique.
05:0505:05, 28 December 2007 diff hist +30 Junk (ship) Corrected to length as given by primary sources, considering modern re-estimates are given below.
05:0205:02, 28 December 2007 diff hist +8 Junk (ship) Also corrected the length to 200-250 feet as given from the indicated source, rather than 59-84 meters.
05:0105:01, 28 December 2007 diff hist +146 Junk (ship) Added some more info that's more widespread by the present historic community than the one we have now.
04:2804:28, 28 December 2007 diff hist +15 List of longest wooden ships →Unconfirmed large wooden ships
04:2704:27, 28 December 2007 diff hist −28 List of longest wooden ships Added another famous approximation to the ship, since it's more taken in by the historic community than the one we have now.
04:2204:22, 28 December 2007 diff hist −347 Chinese treasure ship Personal commentary needs to go with sources. Please don't pull them up by yourself. Note that Chinese ships did tend to have low ratios, some even around 1:1, although it's rare.
04:1904:19, 28 December 2007 diff hist +135 Chinese treasure ship Added more info, considering the former estimation is the more popular in historic journals but is not even mentioned in the article
03:5703:57, 28 December 2007 diff hist −1 Pre-industrial armoured ships Again, the source and information have nothing in common. Changed data to be more in line with the given source.
03:4903:49, 28 December 2007 diff hist −3 Pre-industrial armoured ships →Evidence in East Asia
03:2703:27, 28 December 2007 diff hist +25 List of longest wooden ships Shown source/reference gives 200-250 ft rather than 194-276 feet. The former is more specific anyways.

20:0520:05, 27 December 2007 diff hist +1 Chinese treasure ship Corrected length from source
05:4705:47, 27 December 2007 diff hist −16 Pre-industrial armoured ships I deleted the POV talk which used Stephen Turnball's source, which is a twisting of the source material, in which the arthor's point was completely different. He wasn't even talking of the same ship
05:3005:30, 27 December 2007 diff hist +575 N User:Gnip ←Created page with 'Gotta love personality quizes What is Your World View? You scored as a Materialist Materialism stresses the essence of fundamental particles. Everything that exi...' current
03:5903:59, 27 December 2007 diff hist −2,582 Four Great Inventions Edited out most POV commentaries on "who contributed more". If anyone wants to put them back up, please make sure to leave the POV's behind.
03:5603:56, 27 December 2007 diff hist +279 Talk:Four Great Inventions →The Historical debate section has to be changed or to be removed