Module talk:Protected edit request

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 17:27, 4 August 2025 (Template-protected edit request on 4 August 2025: reader-friendly). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

On mobile

Can this please be made visible on mobile? There's no good reason for it not being visible. Hairy Dude (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Error: Protected edit requests can only be made on the talk page." error

@Pppery: I see you made the latest edit (16 July 2021) to this module, in the area where this error is generated.

See Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox#Current requests for edits to a protected page where errors are shown where Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit is transcluded to dashboards. These are not errors on the Requests for page protection/Edit page itself, even though this isn't a talk page. Can you stop flagging errors when this page is transcluded elsewhere? Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 00:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Non-talk pages with an edit request template is flooded with user dashboards. – wbm1058 (talk) 00:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi wbm1058, thanks for the report – this is now being fixed (Template_talk:Submit_an_edit_request#Protected edit request on 16 July 2021); I'm not yet sure if additional reverts are needed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

override can only be made on the talk page

Anyone want to put in another argument to override this check please? Sometimes these are on places like WP:IANB - and it would be useful to enqueue the request to the report and category. — xaosflux Talk 23:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Pppery: this something you could look in to? — xaosflux Talk 13:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done Passing |skiptalk=yes now overrides that check. I also removed the check for being on RFPP (part of an idea of mine to merge Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit with the edit request template process that turned out not to work and was abandoned), and fixed a longstanding bug where {{edit protected}} on a non-talk page caused an error. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Text for template-protected

Can the text for {{edit template-protected}} be enhanced to mention using {{ETp}} for responses? For example, {{edit semi-protected}} currently displays You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response..—Bagumba (talk) 04:03, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 4 August 2025

When an edit request is either answered or not answered AND the parameter used in the underlying wikitext for that particular request is |ans= and not |answered=, the texts in the two boxes currently say:

(when not answered:)

[...] To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

(when answered:)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.



I think they should be changed to say:

(when answered:)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

(when not answered:)

[...] To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |ans=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

FaviFake (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

This feels like a lot of extra effort for not much value to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Not done. Using |answered= instead of its short alias, |ans=, is more reader-friendly. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply