Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.A.N.M&V.V.R.S.R POLYTECHNIC

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Just Chilling (talk | contribs) at 16:46, 31 March 2012 (A.A.N.M&V.V.R.S.R POLYTECHNIC: +sp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
A.A.N.M&V.V.R.S.R POLYTECHNIC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Normally, I would not nominate this for deletion since it is a school, but sadly I was not able to find enough reliable sources to establish its notability. My respect for Indian schools is alright after I watched 3 Idiots but I still believe that this school just isn't notable enough. Yes it is a college, which normally is notable, but I could not find sources about this particular college. Its founder apparently had founded many other schools, all of which also seem to be non-notable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - We keep tertiary instituions for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Indian colleges because, unlike US colleges, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this polytechnic cannot meet notability requirements. TerriersFan (talk) 16:44, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]