Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shell-core effect
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 05:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Shell-core effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
At first this article, nothing more than a single unpunctuated, unreferenced sentence, looked like a candidate for speedy deletion or a redirect to food coma, but after a little research I cannot find very much to support the current definition. There are a mere 10 Google web hits for the term [1], most of them Wikipedia mirrors, and nothing independent relating to the term as defined. Searches on Google Books and Google Scholar return mostly information related to molecular physics and polymers, and out of the two results I could find related to biology, one defines it as the process of vasoconstriction associated with hypothermia ([2]), while the other defines it as vasodilation ([3]). No idea what to do with this now, and in any case the term does not seem to be a widely-recognised one (outside of polymer physics, anyway). ~Matticus TC 08:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for a lack of sources. --Huon 09:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unsourced, poorly written dictionary definition article. VanTucky (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or turn into dab page linking hypothermia & the physics usages. No Medline hits supporting the usage claimed here. Espresso Addict 23:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.