Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Using Three Words

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using Three Words

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A band that has received some local success in Canberra. Not independently sourced. Nothing satisfying wp:music, battle of the bands is local, no evidence awards are major (finalist or top ten only), rotation not national, only one ep release, notability not inherited from supporting acts, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Paragraphs 4-7 may be copyvio from unearthed page. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - They've had some limited success, but there isn't the coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.