- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 00:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Web Bot Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Removed prod. Reason given by User:Ijsf who placed the tag was "No scientific basis whatsoever. Zero credible sources on the subject. Orphaned and disputed. Justification of predictions based on unproven claims in primary source". Although I was actually the reviewer who created this article through WP:AfC I now agree with this assessment. Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:34, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't see encyclopedic notability here. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 16:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ! Chzz ► 16:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm not seeing the reliable sources needed to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 18:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - there is no alternate information on this subject, and this is the most reliable data on the internet.
Zk ► 16:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.3.33 (talk) [reply]
- What you have stated to support your opionion is a reason for deletion , nit a reason for inclusion. The lack of reliable sources means we cannot write verifiable article about the subject. -- Whpq (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.