L3 PAR and HISOLZEN
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:05 pm America/New_York
Hi,
We would like to know if HISOLZEN pixels should be removed or kept for your L3 Photosynthetically Available Radiation (PAR) daily average product.
The PAR ATBD https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/resources/atbd/par/ specifies that:
Level-3 Masking LAND,HISOLZEN,NAVFAIL,FILTER,HIGLINT
but I think that HISOLZEN is not applied on your L3 PAR, I checked on your L3 browser using the monthly climatology PAR vs RR443 (Aqua November monthly clim):

Is the PAR data less degraded on HISOLZEN than other ocean parameters like Rrs?
We tried to asses this using your SeaBASS in-situ validation tool which provides a configurable SZA threshold, but unfortunately we found no matchups with SZA>75°.
We also found this 2016 paper about PAR: "Extending the PAR products to Sun zenith angles larger than 75 degrees, a planned task, will
necessitate relaxing simplifying assumptions, e.g., the quasi single-scattering approximation, in the retrieval of the
cloud/surface albedo."
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jing-Tan-12/publication/303324080_Estimating_photosynthetically_available_radiation_at_the_ocean_surface_for_primary_production_3P_Project_modeling_evaluation_and_application_to_global_MERIS_imagery/links/5c5bc33992851c48a9bfdbc8/Estimating-photosynthetically-available-radiation-at-the-ocean-surface-for-primary-production-3P-Project-modeling-evaluation-and-application-to-global-MERIS-imagery.pdf
Thanks,
Julien
We would like to know if HISOLZEN pixels should be removed or kept for your L3 Photosynthetically Available Radiation (PAR) daily average product.
The PAR ATBD https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/resources/atbd/par/ specifies that:
Level-3 Masking LAND,HISOLZEN,NAVFAIL,FILTER,HIGLINT
but I think that HISOLZEN is not applied on your L3 PAR, I checked on your L3 browser using the monthly climatology PAR vs RR443 (Aqua November monthly clim):

Is the PAR data less degraded on HISOLZEN than other ocean parameters like Rrs?
We tried to asses this using your SeaBASS in-situ validation tool which provides a configurable SZA threshold, but unfortunately we found no matchups with SZA>75°.
We also found this 2016 paper about PAR: "Extending the PAR products to Sun zenith angles larger than 75 degrees, a planned task, will
necessitate relaxing simplifying assumptions, e.g., the quasi single-scattering approximation, in the retrieval of the
cloud/surface albedo."
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jing-Tan-12/publication/303324080_Estimating_photosynthetically_available_radiation_at_the_ocean_surface_for_primary_production_3P_Project_modeling_evaluation_and_application_to_global_MERIS_imagery/links/5c5bc33992851c48a9bfdbc8/Estimating-photosynthetically-available-radiation-at-the-ocean-surface-for-primary-production-3P-Project-modeling-evaluation-and-application-to-global-MERIS-imagery.pdf
Thanks,
Julien