Discussione:Trusted computing: differenze tra le versioni

Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Nessun oggetto della modifica
Djechelon (discussione | contributi)
Riga 124:
[....]
With respect to viruses, the contribution from the NGSCB architecture is more straightforward. Since the nexus and NCAs do not interfere with the operation of any program running in the regular Windows environment, everything, including the native operating system and viruses, runs there as it does today. Therefore, users are still going to need antivirus monitoring and detection software in Windows as well. However, the NGSCB architecture does provide features that can be used by an antivirus program to help guarantee that it has not been corrupted. The antivirus software can be grounded in such a way that it can bootstrap itself into a protected execution state, something it cannot do today.
 
 
 
preso da http://www.microsoft.com/technet/archive/security/news/ngscb.mspx?mfr=true
questo secondo voi va negli 'ostacoli tecnici ' o va semplicemente ignorato ?
:Secondo me va messo come nota dolente dei potenziali vantaggi.--[[Utente:Djechelon|ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ]] 22:35, 6 lug 2006 (CEST)
Ritorna alla pagina "Trusted computing".