Discussione:Tron (hacker): differenze tra le versioni
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Sentenza |
|||
Riga 192:
Iaal is a State Attorney. :-(
:so? the congress of the USA has been banned... he can be whatever, but fact is that he's wrong and he's trolling. --[[Utente:Looris|Lo'oris - ロホリス]] 14:18, 11 feb 2006 (CET)
== Sentenza ==
da en.wiki:
:Today the court's ruling was published. An English language press article (among many) is [http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/69391 here]. The original press release by the court is [http://www.kammergericht.de/presse/PM04_2006.htm here].
:I apologize for not updating the article myself, mainly because it would take me too long right now to do it properly - look up the correct translations of the legal terms, etc - and also because I feel I am too involved in the discussions on de: to be the right person to do this. However, I think I am summarizing the media reports accurately in saying that the verdict means a full victory for Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.; the judge denied that mentioning the full surname would violate either Tron's post-mortal personality rights (? "Postmortales Persönlichkeitsrecht") or his parent's personality rights. This was the view held by more or less all the legal experts who had commented publicly on the case, except the plaintiff's lawyer of course. According to [http://www.stern.de/computer-technik/internet/:Rechtsstreit-Wikipedia-Streit-Namensnennung/555279.html this Associated Press report] (German) he was furious about the ruling, storming out of the courtroom even before the verdict was read out. He announced almost immediately to appeal the decision. regards, [[en:User:High on a tree|High on a tree]] 02:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
riassunto: sia il giudice, sia tutti gli esperti interpellati (eccetto il difensore dell'accusa, ovviamente) hanno dato ragione a chi mette il nome per intero. --[[Utente:Looris|Lo'oris - ロホリス]] 14:24, 11 feb 2006 (CET)
| |||