Talk:Character-oriented terminal

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Tedickey in topic re: Do we need this article

re: Do we need this article

edit

I don't know - if some editors feel compelled to remove the content, calling it "copyedit", there's not a lot to discuss. Tedickey (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Tedickey, being ironic and aggressive doesn't add merit to your argument. Content for the sake of content does not make an article better. The substance of what I erased is still there, the rest was self-contradictory and poorly written. Cheers, Adamantios (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Likewise (reflecting on your comments would be helpful to you as well):- the interesting part of the content is all removed, rather than restructuring it and sourcing it. Looking forward to improvements. Tedickey (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vaguely related, would it be worth merging Block-oriented terminal? The two types of terminals are mostly interesting in their opposition to each other, and there'd be less duplication and more material for a substantial article. --Delirium (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps - but discussing two opposites in one topic doesn't seem to work often (except in the rare case where the topic is devoted to a comparison of the two). Tedickey (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply