This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Teen escort company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of social work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
The content of Gooning was merged into Teen escort company on 10 September 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that ___location, see its talk page.
Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 7 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A new paragraph was added summarizing clinical, regulatory, and public-health perspectives on treatment transport. The existing article was written largely from a single critical viewpoint, relying mostly on advocacy and journalistic sources. Under WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE, the page should represent all significant, reliably sourced perspectives—not only criticism.
The new paragraph:
Cites independent, mainstream medical and policy sources (e.g., the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), the U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory, peer-reviewed outcome reviews, and state statutes such as Utah SB 239 and Utah Code 26B-2-125).
References professional provider literature only to illustrate established clinical practices (de-escalation, consent where possible, family communication).
Maintains neutral tone and avoids promotional or moral framing.
Restores balance by showing that licensed, clinically supervised transport and residential care exist within the broader U.S. behavioral-health system and are subject to increasing regulation.
This addition improves compliance with WP:V and WP:NPOV by providing sourced, neutral context. Unless there are specific sourcing concerns, the paragraph should remain, and future revisions should continue to expand balanced coverage of both clinical and critical perspectives.
I appreciate that you created a talkpage section on this, I appreciate your bold edit and your source searching. I have very limited insight in the sources used here. I do have concerns:
The Interactive Youth Transport blog is a primary source and might not be usable/appropriate to balance against claims of significant abuse.
The two studies listed don't seem to be about teen escort companies, but about residential centres themselves. As such, they might not give any insight at all about the impact of gooning specifically. Moreover, they cannot be used to claim that anything is "recognized by major medical bodies." That's not how a study works.
In general, I do not see the relevance of a sentence about "residential treatment" in general (an extremely broad subject) within an article that should stay focused on teen escort companies.