512-bit computing: Revision history

17 September 2020

• curprev 09:3009:30, 17 September 2020 Widefox talk contribs 2,613 bytes +5 →top: ref -> prim undo

2 January 2020

• curprev 16:4516:45, 2 January 2020 Amakuru talk contribs m 2,608 bytes 0 Amakuru moved page 512-bit to 512-bit computing: consistency with 64-bit computing following recent RM there undo

27 November 2019

• curprev 08:3808:38, 27 November 2019 H3r08r1n3 talk contribs m 2,608 bytes +2 →Uses: Fixed typing/spelling mistakes. undo

19 November 2019

• curprev 12:2812:28, 19 November 2019 82.242.153.58 talk 2,606 bytes +71 →Uses undo

8 August 2019

• curprev 13:0613:06, 8 August 2019 General Ization talk contribs 2,535 bytes −28 Reverted 1 edit by 193.116.83.185: Why, when we already have a lovely template at the top of every one of theses page that provides navigation to articles concerning any common bit width? (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 12:5112:51, 8 August 2019 193.116.83.185 talk 2,563 bytes +28 →Uses: Added 'See also section'. Added content to 'See also section. NB, currently, there is no '1024-bit' article in Wikipedia. If there were, then I would have added that also to the 'See also section'. In my view, for consistency, each Wikipedia article on bit-size should have a 'See also section' at the end that links to the Wikipedia article on the next smaller bit size, and to the Wikipedia article on the next larger bit sIze. This proves the need for the exception to the curre... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

30 April 2019

• curprev 18:3718:37, 30 April 2019 Guy Harris talk contribs 2,535 bytes −235 Update link. undo
• curprev 13:3513:35, 30 April 2019 InternetArchiveBot talk contribs 2,770 bytes +224 Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta14) undo

14 April 2019

• curprev 01:1901:19, 14 April 2019 In vivo veritas talk contribs 2,546 bytes +11 →Uses undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

7 June 2018

• curprev 21:2421:24, 7 June 2018 Giggity talk contribs 2,535 bytes −123 That's a trivia, not a use. undo

28 February 2018

• curprev 03:1503:15, 28 February 2018 RandoNandoz talk contribs 2,658 bytes +126 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit

10 January 2018

• curprev 22:1422:14, 10 January 2018 Widefox talk contribs m 2,532 bytes +4 links per WP:CAPTION undo

2 April 2017

• curprev 14:3514:35, 2 April 2017 Divof talk contribs m 2,528 bytes +9 →Uses: A little bit more precise undo

30 September 2016

• curprev 08:5208:52, 30 September 2016 158.42.174.52 talk 2,519 bytes +32 No edit summary undo

28 July 2016

• curprev 06:1506:15, 28 July 2016 Syced talk contribs 2,487 bytes +121 →Uses: pic undo

14 March 2016

• curprev 11:2511:25, 14 March 2016 Robin S talk contribs 2,366 bytes +56 partial revert of edit by ZERGSOMG on 10 July 2014: it was the numerical figure that was in error, not the claim about particles undo

29 April 2015

• curprev 11:5411:54, 29 April 2015 Comp.arch talk contribs 2,310 bytes −32 "Newest addition" is bad wording. Not sure about the timeline or best wording, but seems better. undo

12 February 2015

• curprev 17:2517:25, 12 February 2015 JSpung talk contribs m 2,342 bytes −3 Reverted good faith edits by 85.97.137.26 talk: edit test AGF (HG) undo
• curprev 16:5316:53, 12 February 2015 85.97.137.26 talk 2,345 bytes +3 No edit summary undo

31 January 2015

• curprev 03:1503:15, 31 January 2015 Beland talk contribs 2,342 bytes −29 de-stub undo

20 January 2015

• curprev 16:0716:07, 20 January 2015 Gilliam talk contribs m 2,371 bytes −107 Reverted edits by 86.185.1.121 (talk) to last version by Widefox undo
• curprev 16:0616:06, 20 January 2015 86.185.1.121 talk 2,478 bytes +107 No edit summary undo

8 October 2014

• curprev 10:2510:25, 8 October 2014 Widefox talk contribs 2,371 bytes +292 →Uses: add AVX-512 undo

18 July 2014

• curprev 22:3322:33, 18 July 2014 68.46.50.85 talk 2,079 bytes +1 →Uses undo

10 July 2014

• curprev 17:3017:30, 10 July 2014 ZERGSOMG talk contribs 2,078 bytes −73 A yottabyte is 10^24, while there are 10^80 particles in the observable universe alone, not counting the whole universe, likely to be infinite. The sentence is categorically wrong. undo

17 June 2014

• curprev 20:3020:30, 17 June 2014 Azarealius talk contribs m 2,151 bytes 0 Fixed a typo. undo

16 June 2014

• curprev 17:5817:58, 16 June 2014 ZOMPZIMP talk contribs 2,151 bytes +140 →Uses undo

2 January 2014

• curprev 21:2021:20, 2 January 2014 82.30.172.164 talk 2,011 bytes −4 →Uses undo

22 December 2013

• curprev 22:4822:48, 22 December 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 2,015 bytes +14 →Uses: Point to the section about the 290. undo
• curprev 22:4722:47, 22 December 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 2,001 bytes −25 →Uses: Use a wikilink, and fix it. undo
• curprev 21:4221:42, 22 December 2013 39.48.171.189 talk 2,026 bytes +132 →Uses undo

10 October 2013

• curprev 14:2014:20, 10 October 2013 Widefox talk contribs m 1,894 bytes +4 →Uses: link undo

9 October 2013

• curprev 19:3619:36, 9 October 2013 Blin00 talk contribs 1,890 bytes 0 →Uses undo Tag: Visual edit

25 September 2013

• curprev 22:3622:36, 25 September 2013 75.183.98.129 talk 1,890 bytes +67 No edit summary undo

13 August 2013

• curprev 19:0419:04, 13 August 2013 Nasa-verve talk contribs 1,823 bytes +443 Filling in 3 references using Reflinks undo
• curprev 06:0706:07, 13 August 2013 BG19bot talk contribs m 1,380 bytes 0 WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #61. Punctuation goes before References. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (9399) undo

4 August 2013

• curprev 22:3622:36, 4 August 2013 Yowanvista talk contribs m 1,380 bytes +259 →Uses: Added references to GPU products. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 22:3322:33, 4 August 2013 Yowanvista talk contribs m 1,121 bytes +142 No edit summary undo

5 July 2013

• curprev 22:0222:02, 5 July 2013 Widefox talk contribs 979 bytes +31 Added {{ref improve}} tag to article (TW) undo
• curprev 21:5721:57, 5 July 2013 Widefox talk contribs 948 bytes +50 nav template, stub undo

16 February 2013

• curprev 21:0021:00, 16 February 2013 Darío Alafita Pérez talk contribs 898 bytes −14 Categorized undo

11 February 2013

• curprev 17:1117:11, 11 February 2013 Bearcat talk contribs 912 bytes +38 →References: categorization/tagging using AWB (8686) undo

9 February 2013

• curprev 23:1323:13, 9 February 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 874 bytes −9 Use "bits" rather than "binary digits", as we're using "bit" everywhere else in the article, including the title. undo
• curprev 23:1123:11, 9 February 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 883 bytes +377 Copy over material from the 256-bit page to clarify that the Xeon Phi does not operate on 512-bit numbers, just on groups of 16 32-bit numbers or 8 64-bit numbers. undo
• curprev 22:2522:25, 9 February 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 506 bytes −8 The developers guide calls them "vector registers". undo
• curprev 22:2122:21, 9 February 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 514 bytes +4 Link vector processing unit. undo
• curprev 06:3906:39, 9 February 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 510 bytes +67 They don't hold 512-bit floating-point numbers, they hold 16 32-bit or 8 64-bit floating-point numbers. undo
• curprev 06:3806:38, 9 February 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 443 bytes +350 More details and a reference. undo
• curprev 06:3406:34, 9 February 2013 Guy Harris talk contribs 93 bytes +1 Hell, struct { char name[512]; } is a "512-bit data structure" on just about any machine that supports C. Give a somewhat more precise description (to be filled in with more details). undo
• curprev 04:5604:56, 9 February 2013 Boxstaa talk contribs 92 bytes +92 ←Created page with '{{n-bit|1=512|2=}} Currently, the Intel Xeon Phi has a 512-bit data structure.'